decision.host
首页 / 模型 / Celeris-1 Decision

Celeris-1 Decision

Celeris ChoiceNoulScore systemonemodels.org

Celeris-1 Decision is a hosted System One model from Celeris. It answers typed Noul, Choice and Score questions about text, structured data or images with probabilities, and can add a one-sentence reason per answer. It costs $0.04 per million input tokens, and the weights are closed.

该模型目前没有出现在 S1MB 或 Decision Index 的公开评测结果中。

模型信息

厂商
Celeris
类别
开源权重
参数规模
未公开
权重
闭源 / 未公开
许可证
未标注 许可不明
输入模态
文本
决策原语
ChoiceNoulScore
延迟
67-81 ms
可微调
未确认
上架状态
Generally available

数据来源与链接

本站聚合自: systemonemodels.org。 分数与链接均指向原始出处。

来自 systemonemodels.org 的详细介绍

What Celeris-1 Decision is

Celeris-1 Decision is a System One model from Celeris, a lab that builds diffusion language models for low latency. Tom Hamer announced it on 8 October 2026. You send text, structured data or images and a set of typed questions, and it returns a probability for each outcome. It is a hosted API with no open weights and no fine-tuning in this release.

What it returns

The main endpoint is POST https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemone. It implements TypeSafe’s System One API, so code written for Jev with the Jev SDK runs against it once you change the base URL, key and model name. A second endpoint, POST /v1/decisions, follows the OpenAI Decisions API format. Both serve the same model at the same price. A Noul returns the probability of yes. A Choice returns a probability per option, and a Score returns a probability per level plus the probability-weighted level. Setting x_celeris.explain adds one sentence per question saying why the model chose its answer. That makes the request slower and cuts the cap from 512 questions to 64.

What it is good at

Celeris’s docs use ticket routing as their example, which maps to support inbox triage and intent and model routing. Its launch post also checks an expense claim against a photo of a receipt, with up to 8 images per request. The launch post reports a median of 67 ms for one question and 81 ms for fifty, from an AWS us-east-1 client. Celeris ran those measurements itself, so treat them as vendor-run. The same post reports results from Celeris’s own decision-benching harness (commit 0cfd276), which called each provider’s endpoint and scored every answer with one scorer. On the 22 datasets and 3,210 items of jev-bench, Celeris-1 Decision scores 0.800 accuracy and 0.272 Brier, against 0.731 and 0.380 for Jev 1.13.0 and 0.790 and 0.288 for pplx-decider-v1.1-27b. A Brier score is the squared distance between the predicted probabilities and the right answer, so lower is better. These figures are vendor-run. The calibration claim rests only on Brier scores that Celeris computed itself. The post also reports typed-decisions results. That benchmark is the one the Decider 1 page describes as built by meraGPT, so this page leaves those figures out. BenchLM shows the jev-bench numbers and labels them provider-reported, with no overall rank. Benchmark Heaven’s JevBench does not list the model as of 9 October 2026.

What it is not for

It writes no free text. The only prose is the optional one-sentence explanation. There are no weights to self-host. The context window and the numeric rate limit are not published as of 9 October 2026. Images must be base64 data URLs, with no external links.

Access

It is available now through a Celeris API key, with prepaid credit bought by card in the Console. TypeSafe’s typesafe-sdk for Python works with base_url set to https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision. Credit expires 30 days after it is granted, and an empty balance returns 402.

Specifications

Question types Choice Score Noul Max Choice options512 Score levelsUp to 64 Questions per call512 Total contextNot documented State budgetNot documented Rate limitLimits are per workspace and per model, and all API keys in a workspace share them. Going over returns HTTP 429 with a Retry-After header, as rate_limit_exceeded or service_busy. The numeric limit is not published as of 9 October 2026, and Celeris tells customers to contact it for a committed or higher rate. EndpointPOST https://inference.celeris.ai/celeris-1-decision/v1/systemone SDKsPython: typesafe-sdk The context window is not published as of 9 October 2026. The docs limit a request to 512 questions, or 64 when x_celeris.explain is true, 512 options per Choice, 64 levels per Score, 8 images of up to 25 megapixels each, 100,000 JSON values and an 8 MiB body. Images are base64 data URLs, count as input tokens and are read at the resolution set by x_celeris.max_soft_tokens. External image URLs are not supported. Each response is one JSON body with no streaming.

Versions

celeris-1-decision, 8 Oct 2026, The only version. The launch post is dated 8 October 2026. The model id in the request body must match the model segment of the URL path. The docs also serve it at POST /v1/decisions in the OpenAI Decisions API format, with the OpenAI Python SDK 3.26.0 or later. Release notes

Use cases

What people use Celeris-1 Decision for, one page per pattern. Workflow controlStarter

Support inbox triage with System One models

Send a support ticket to Jev once with every question attached. Category comes back as a selected label, severity and frustration as numbers on scales you wrote, refund intent as a probability. Your code reads those values and decides what happens to the ticket. Choice Score Noul Workflow controlIntermediate

Intent and model routing with System One models

One Jev call reads an incoming request and returns its intent as a label plus a difficulty rating on a scale you wrote. Your router reads both numbers and picks the handler: deterministic code, a cheap model, an expensive one, or a human queue. Choice Score VendorCeleris TypeCommercial, hosted API StatusGenerally available Announced8 Oct 2026 AccessOpened 8 Oct 2026 Input price$0.04 per 1M tokens Output priceFree Latency67 to 81 ms (vendor claim) ContextNot published Rate limitLimits are per workspace and per model, and all API keys in a workspace share them. Going over returns HTTP 429 with a Retry-After header, as rate_limit_exceeded or service_busy. The numeric limit is not published as of 9 October 2026, and Celeris tells customers to contact it for a committed or higher rate. API docsdocs.celeris.ai

Sources

01Celeris-1-decision launch post (Tom Hamer, 8 October 2026) celeris.ai 02Decisions (Celeris docs) docs.celeris.ai 03Pricing (Celeris docs) docs.celeris.ai 04Rate limits (Celeris docs) docs.celeris.ai 05Models (Celeris docs) docs.celeris.ai 06About Celeris celeris.ai 07Celeris terms of service celeris.ai 08Celeris-1 Decision (BenchLM) benchlm.ai 09JevBench by Benchmark Heaven benchmarkheaven.com 10typesafe-sdk on PyPI pypi.org